The head of the Arab Organization for Penal Reform Mohamed Zaree said that since his coming to power, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi has used to refer all his political opponents to the judiciary in trials he claims are fair, which lead them to the death penalty.
He added in statements to the episode (4/10/2020) of the “Beyond the News” program that death sentences turned into a method of sentencing to Sisi, and that the attorneys for those against whom the death sentences were carried out confirm that their clients were not fairly tried, and that the trial took place before non-competent courts. Many of them were subjected to enforced disappearance.
He pointed out that the executions have not stopped in Egypt since 2014 until now, explaining that the number of those executed during this period has reached about 200, which is a high number that Egypt has never witnessed even during the rule of former President Muhammad Hosni Mubarak, and accordingly The death sentences are a message from Sisi to everyone who obstructs his rule.
It is noteworthy that the “We Record” human rights platform announced that the Egyptian authorities carried out the death sentence against 15 political detainees yesterday morning, and Egyptian sources confirmed on Saturday that the authorities had executed only two of the detainees in the case known as the dispersal of the Alexandria sit-in in 2013.
This comes in light of the demonstrations taking place in an atmosphere of congestion and popular protest against the policies of the Egyptian President’s regime, in addition to the deterioration of living conditions suffered by citizens in Egypt.
In turn, the lawyer and political analyst, Asaad Haykal, said that the court strictly enforced the death penalty against those convicted of killing civilians or endangering their lives, and the judge not only takes the death sentence, but rather that there is a committee of judges that takes the verdict, and the Egyptian law gives the accused many guarantees That enables him to appeal the ruling.
He added that the death sentence takes a lot of time to be approved and implemented, not as some people who want to shuffle the cards portray, according to his description, stressing that the implementation of the verdict is surrounded by a lot of secrecy even on the accused himself, accusing human rights organizations of politicizing work and subservience to the Muslim Brotherhood, and he is unlikely to be there Any link between street protests and the implementation of these rulings.
For his part, Front Line Defenders Campaigns Officer Adam Shapiro said that the implementation of death sentences in Egypt raises many questions, and that the Egyptian prison authorities are facing many charges related to the deaths of detainees in prisons due to health negligence, refusing to accept the story presented by the Egyptian authorities.
He questioned the veracity of the death account, opening the hypothesis of death by medical negligence, in addition to the Egyptian authorities evading announcing this for fear of further international criticism of them, considering the implementation of the sentences to send a message to the protesters in the street.
It is noteworthy that the Egyptian regime has faced repeated international human rights criticism due to what organizations described as excessive execution of death sentences against its opponents after trials that were described as unfair, and Egypt during the era of President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi ranked sixth in the world in terms of the implementation of death sentences after China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam and Iraq.