The countries of the Eastern Mediterranean have brought together interesting agreements and alliances for many years through which they shared suspicious goals, and it seems that Turkey is the target country on the coasts of the Mediterranean through these agreements, as some countries that have sought to be part of these alliances, such as France, have already become a party In these agreements, it has gained the upper hand in everything related to eastern Mediterranean affairs, while no one takes into account Turkey’s position on what is happening, not to mention that no one cares what it wants. All these agreements also aim mainly to tighten the noose on Turkey until it becomes incapable of even catching fish in its maritime domain.
Turkey is known to be among the countries with the longest coast on the Mediterranean; However, it is ignored when it comes to what is happening in the coasts of the Mediterranean, and this continued until Turkey reached an agreement with Libya, and revealed the initiative to demarcate the border with Greece, which sparked protests and protests.
France, for example, which does not have any right in the Eastern Mediterranean, was able, through old agreements, to get more gains from Egypt, and by signing an agreement with Greece, Egypt – on behalf of its people – ruled itself by death.
Turkey has faced these objections objectively through proofs and irrefutable evidence, thus undermining the idea of eligibility for prescription, to frustrate the efforts of these countries. During this stage, Turkey addressed each country separately, clarifying the legal basis for each issue. The contentious issues between Turkey and Greece differ from those between Turkey and Israel, and the same applies to the outstanding issues between Turkey and the West, or between Turkey and Egypt. Turkey has been able to clarify this for each party in a language it can understand and to draw the boundaries and nature of each issue.
The dispute with Egypt is among the outstanding issues that Turkey deals with. As for the position of the Sisi regime, the spokesman for Egypt, regarding what is happening in the Mediterranean is not without its strange. Through these agreements, each country seeks to serve the largest of its interests with the exception of Egypt, which participates by waiving a large part of its rights in favor of other parties.
France, for example, which does not have any right in the Eastern Mediterranean, was able through old agreements to get more gains from Egypt, and by signing an agreement with Greece, Egypt – on behalf of its people – ruled itself by death.
Given the reason behind Egypt dragging itself into this impasse, it is clear that standing against Turkey was tempting, and regarding this particular point, Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan sent a message to Egypt in which he made clear that known differences with Sisi do not make it necessary for Egypt to adopt such This situation, which would harm the rights of Egyptians in the Mediterranean, indicating that they are not obliged to do so, and this message has been received through intelligence communication channels that have never stopped.
The presence of some disagreements with Egypt does not mean the interruption of communication, the absence of understanding, or the lack of common gains between the two countries in some areas, which applies to Turkey’s disputes with Russia, Iran and the United States of America, which does not mean that they do not have common interests, cooperation agreements and trade exchanges.
This message resonated, and there was much debate about it in the pro-Sisi media, and some politicians interpreted it as a sign that Turkey is finally back on the side of Egypt, and that it is trying to woo Egypt, to the point of preparing a list of demands to accept the Turkish offer.
When asked about this issue, the Egyptian Foreign Minister, Sameh Shoukry, replied, “Nice words are not enough. We are looking at actions.” By this he meant Turkey’s withdrawal from Syria, Iraq and Libya, although these issues have nothing to do with Egypt. However, these demands in fact reflected the demands of the countries that funded them, and this was an opportunity to present them.
Applies to those Turkish proverb that says, “A hungry chicken sees wheat wards in her dreams.” In what dreams did these people sank until they saw Erdogan hand over those innocent people who sought refuge to him to this unjust regime after what they suffered from oppression and oppression in their country? What is the psychological state that controls them to the point of making them dream that Erdogan apologizes to Sisi?
Out of enthusiasm for this idea, representatives of the media center began to present their conditions before the politicians, which proceed from Turkey’s position on Egypt, similar to the demand for the extradition of political opponents, who fled to Turkey, to the Egyptian regime, and the closure of all channels they established in Istanbul; Some of them even went so far as to demand that President Erdogan apologize to Sisi.
Applies to those Turkish proverb that says, “A hungry chicken sees wheat wards in her dreams.” In what dreams did these people sank until they saw Erdogan hand over those innocent people who sought refuge to him to this unjust regime after what they suffered from oppression and oppression in their country? What is the psychological state that controls them to the point of making them dream that Erdogan apologizes to Sisi? How could a person like Sisi, who did not hesitate to mercilessly kill thousands of his people and destroy the lives of millions of Egyptians, wait for an apology from one of them when he is demanding an apology from his people in the first place?
Contrary to what was interpreted, Erdogan’s message was intended that Egypt thinks that by standing against Turkey, it can harm its interests. But in fact, it only harms itself, and we have respect for the Egyptian people, their history, their identity and the values they represent.
The Egyptian-Greek agreement clearly harms Egypt’s interest, and does not harm in any way Turkey. Because he does not concern her in anything, and there is no need for such irrational behavior by the current Egyptian administration; Because by doing so, its people, its history, and its army are greatly harmed, and it is clear that it is not proceeding according to a political plan set by it, but rather driven by external directives, not to mention that there is no benefit to Turkey from establishing relations with the Sisi regime at the present time for several reasons, including the absence of an economic environment that encourages On investment.
The situation Egypt reached under Sisi’s administration is clearly visible – the rampant corruption, oppression, mismanagement, and state interference in every field – and the arbitrary laws did not leave a safe environment for the economy, and the primary goal of this type of coups was to ensure the arrival of this dictator to power, not to enhance confidence in The Egyptian economy, and all this means that no one will be harmed by the absence of relations with Egypt.
Egypt today does not enjoy real independence that allows it to practice its own policy, which deprives it of free will, which gives it the right to choose to establish relations with Turkey that serve its interests. For this reason, Egyptian politicians involve themselves in misunderstood matters in order to serve the interests of their supporters, by demanding the achievement of agendas far from the Egyptian issue, and in this way they are trying to raise their position with the donor parties, and they announce by order of the axis that finances them to turn the pages of the stage that did not Start after.