Home / news / Is there a diplomatic solution to the Nagorno Karabakh issue?

Is there a diplomatic solution to the Nagorno Karabakh issue?

The conflict that has continued for more than 30 years between Azerbaijan and Armenia topped the scene again in early July, after the attack launched by Armenia on the regions of Azerbaijan. This attack is not the first of its kind, especially since this region is considered under Armenian occupation.

It is difficult to understand this aggression on the part of the Armenians, since in every attack on the Azerbaijani regions they are reminded of their colonial face, and the importance of exerting pressure on them to end this occupation. In general, Armenia should have not risked launching the attack in order to preserve the areas it occupied.

With such steps, Armenia gains the time that makes its occupation a fait accompli, especially as it derives its power from the superpowers that will not win anything from the war. It should be noted that the Minsk Group, which was established to solve the dilemma between the two countries 28 years ago, has not Do nothing but provide opportunity to Armenia. For its part, Russia – which prevented the supply of arms to Azerbaijan and sought to prevent the arming of the Azerbaijanis – did not hesitate to supply the Armenians with heavy weapons, and in light of the imbalance in armaments, Armenia’s occupation of the Azerbaijani regions became possible.

The continuous diplomatic negotiations were nothing but confirmation of the Armenian occupation, especially with the “settlement” of Armenians in the occupied areas, which makes this occupation more permanent, and with Azerbaijan’s resistance to the attack, all parties have become; Like the European Union, the United States and Armenia are seeking to find a diplomatic solution to bring peace to the region.

Although the Minsk Group claims to be neutral; However, in fact, while seeking to find a diplomatic solution, it made the Armenian occupation a fait accompli, and if we refer to the countries that head this group, such as the United States, France and Russia, it must be noted that it has a strong Armenian lobby, and this lobby seeks its activities in these three countries. To extract decisions in line with the Armenian issue.

With political solutions failing after 28 years, the Armenian aggression becomes easy to understand. In fact, with these moves, Armenia seeks to occupy some areas and create a new situation at the negotiating table. On the other hand, the Armenian side did not, until recently, have enough strength to put an end to the Armenians, while this latest attack from the Armenian side faced strong Azeri resistance, which surprised the Armenians and the other parties.

It is worth noting that the ongoing diplomatic negotiations were nothing but confirmation of the Armenian occupation, especially with the “settlement” of Armenians in the occupied areas, which makes this occupation more permanent, and with Azerbaijan’s resistance to the attack, all parties have become; Like the European Union, the United States and Armenia are seeking to find a diplomatic solution to bring peace to the region.

I wonder about the way these negotiations continued, which lasted for more than 28 years, to find a solution to stop this war. In fact, the solution is in the hands of Azerbaijan, which has a clear plan to liberate Nagorno Karabakh. As for Turkish support in this issue, it is represented in arming Azerbaijan and supplying it with war technology, and Ankara is seeking to take control of matters again in many regions, such as Syria and Libya.

In conclusion: To end this occupation that has lasted for more than 30 years by political means, the parties supporting the Armenians should think again about establishing a solution to this dispute.




Source link

Leave a Reply